adidas
Metalbone CTRL 2026
Shape
round
Weight
352.5g
Balance
even
MSRP
—
Best for: Intermediate players prioritizing placement and a broad contact area, Players wanting a less rigid response than the Counter Viper
No retailer offer is currently listed for this model.
Contributing Scores
Power
Control
Sweet Spot
Maneuverability
Additional Metrics
Comfort
Spin
By Padel.fyi Team. Based on the external reviews linked below; we have not personally tested this racket.
The Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 (2026) is worth considering if you build points through placement and want a forgiving contact area. Two external reviews describe useful control; neither makes it the obvious choice for maximum smash power. Its round shape should not be mistaken for a low balance.
Evidence reviewed October 21, 2026. This is Padel.fyi’s synthesis of external reviews, not our own hands-on test. The sources describe subjective playing experiences, rather than laboratory measurements.
| Specification | Official information |
|---|---|
| Model / reference | Counter Veron 2.6 / 150181 |
| Nominal weight | 365 g, with a stated tolerance of ±10 g |
| Balance | 270 mm |
| Shape / thickness | Round / 38 mm |
| Face / frame | Carbon Flex carbon-and-fiberglass face / carbon frame |
| Core / texture | Black EVA / raised 3D Spin |
Source: Babolat’s Counter Veron 2.6 listing. The database uses 365 g as the nominal value, not a measured test-racket weight. The medium-firm feel label is our reading of the review evidence, not a manufacturer hardness measurement. This page covers the 2.6 generation; our older Counter Veron record is a separate model.
Martin at Padel Reviews, 4:20, describes a broad sweet spot. PDH Sports, from 4:18, likes the Veron’s control when retrieving the ball from the glass. Together these support a forgiving, placement-oriented description. They do not establish that every late or off-center shot will be rescued.
PDH Sports, from 3:11, likes the central contact area and some weight toward the head at the net. Martin, from 6:01, describes stable, controlled net play, while finding the Viper more stable.
Martin also finds the racket agile, but calls its balance low. That explanation conflicts with Babolat’s 270 mm specification and PDH’s impression of forward weight. We retain his handling experience without presenting low balance as a verified fact. If you are sensitive to head weight, try the actual racket with your grip setup.
Martin’s power assessment is moderate. PDH’s Veron section describes more power and control than the softer Vertuo. These are compatible observations: more output than one sibling does not establish a high power ceiling across all rackets. The available sources do not support a detailed ranking of flat smashes, kick smashes and overhead spin.
If you want a distinctly low-balance racket or judge equipment primarily by maximum smash output, start elsewhere. Players who already prefer the Viper’s more rigid response should not assume the Veron offers the same feel at a lower price. Conversely, someone seeking the softest Counter option should compare the Vertuo in person.
It is a plausible choice for an intermediate player who values a broad contact area and controlled rallies. PDH’s closing recommendation places it between the softer Vertuo and more demanding Viper. Your preferred balance and impact feel still matter more than a skill-level label.
Not from these sources. They describe the current racket and its place within the Counter range, but do not provide a controlled comparison against the previous Veron generation. We would not replace a racket you like solely because this one is marked 2.6.
These are choices for different preferences, not the result of a shared head-to-head test.
Check Counter Veron 2.6, reference 150181 on the official Babolat listing. This page has no verified retailer offer; current price, regional availability and stock remain unconfirmed. Do not substitute an older Counter Veron listing simply because the family name matches.
Scores marked as editorial are Padel.fyi interpretations of the individual source reviews, not reviewer-issued numbers. Where a reviewer supplies category ratings, we label and preserve them. Each review is scored only where its playing observations support a category. The overall page rating averages the scored reviews; each category averages only reviews that assess that category. “Not scored” means missing evidence, not poor performance. No comfort, spin or durability rating is inferred. See our review methodology for the scoring limits.
Product image: manufacturer imagery from the official product listing. Image copyright remains with its owner.
Swipe the table to compare all specifications.
| Racket | Shape | Weight | Balance | Power | Control | Maneuverability | Target Player |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
babolat Counter Veron 2.6 2026
Current Racket
| round | 365g | head-heavy | 7.5 | 8.5 | 8.0 | intermediate |
bullpadel Neuron 02 2026 | hybrid | 370g | head-light | 7.2 | 8.5 | 8.3 | intermediate |
head Coello Motion 2026 | diamond | 360g | head-heavy | 8.0 | 7.8 | 7.8 | advanced |
Average score: 8.3 • Based on 2 expert reviews (2 scored) • Last updated: Apr 2026
Join our newsletter for the latest padel news, reviews, and tips delivered to your inbox.
Next Up

The International Padel Federation's acceptance as a World Anti-Doping Code signatory places the sport under the same rigorous testing standards as Olympic disciplines — a prerequisite for global legitimacy that required two years of regulatory overhaul with the International Testing Agency.

HEAD and the Spanish Padel Federation just extended their partnership to 11 years — a bet on continuity in a sport where infrastructure innovation, from MejorSet's "Full Panoramic" courts to FIP's youth tour expansion in Asia, is accelerating faster than ever.

As the World Padel League brings Paula Josemaría, Marta Ortega, and Carlos Daniel Gutiérrez to Mumbai in August, Britain takes a different path — backing community-driven events like PadelFest to expand its player base from the ground up.